Chapter 2 How and Why People Develop and Learn 39
Goodheart-Willcox Publisher
2-14
(Continued.)
Common Research Gathering Methods
Method Description Advantages Disadvantages
Observation
Laboratory
setting
Natural setting
Subjects are brought into
a laboratory to be observed
in behavioral or physical
responses.
Naturalistic observation
(used in field experiments)
uses a setting that is natural
and normal to the subject to
observe responses.
The observation room is
controlled.
External factors are
removed from the setting.
The subject may be more
comfortable in a usual set-
ting than in a lab setting.
Subjects may not realize
they are under observa-
tion, which may create a
more genuine response.
The setting is unnatural
to the subject, which may
influence responses.
The subject is usually
aware that he or she is
being monitored, which
may influence responses.
The observer has less con-
trol over the environment
and therefore less control
over external factors that
may influence responses.
The subject may still be
aware of the researcher’s
presence, which may
influence responses.
Standardized
test
Tests are created to mea-
sure response for multiple
people.
Procedure for testing is
orderly.
Allows comparison to
hundreds of other people.
Scoring is procedural and
less likely to be biased.
Some people are not
good test takers, which
may not accurately reflect
their performance.
Environment may influ-
ence test performance.
Survey The researcher prepares
a list of questions to give to
multiple people.
Responses can be
anonymous.
The researcher is
removed from the line of
direct communication,
allowing participants to
feel at ease in responses.
Can be used to discover
a variety of information;
surveys are easily
customizable.
Survey questions can be
intentionally or uninten-
tionally biased.
Subjects may respond
in a way they feel is “the
right answer” to the sur-
vey question or fear
consequences.
Surveys may not ask all
pertinent questions, which
can lead to skewed infor-
mation in data results.
Some data is collected by keeping all the variables that affect behavior the same
except for one. These are called manipulative experiments. For example, when asking a
group of teens whether or not they should receive an allowance from their parents, the
group could first be divided into two groups. One group would hold part-time jobs, the
other would not. By manipulating this one variable, the outcome could change. Then
again, the manipulated variable (having a job) may have no impact on the teens’ opinion.
Sometimes researchers want to know whether or not data changes over time. In
longitudinal studies, the same individuals are observed over a period of time. Liam
may be asked his opinion on allowance as a teen, and then again as an adult. By fol-
lowing the same individual over time, the researcher can begin to understand variables
that cause change.
Previous Page Next Page